New partnership to help reduce incidence of cervical cancer
PapScreen Victoria and the Victorian Centres Against Sexual Assault (CASAs) have formed a new partnership in an effort to reduce cervical cancer in women who are victim/survivors of sexual assault.
Research undertaken by CASA House (2002) found that some women who have encountered sexual assault are less likely to undergo cervical screening every two years as recommended, increasing their risk of developing cervical cancer as a result. These findings support international research undertaken in the area.
According to Judy Flanagan, representing CASA Forum, health professionals are perfectly placed to improve the cervical screening experience for victim/survivors of sexual assault. In July this year however, a survey undertaken by PapScreen revealed 62 per cent of Victorian nurse Pap test providers had no formal training in the area.
"It is common for women who have experienced sexual violence to associate gynaecological procedures such as the Pap test with feelings of helplessness, vulnerability and shame, and some have even reported re-traumatisation and flashbacks to the assault," said Ms Flanagan.
"It is crucial that health providers and CASA staff receive adequate training to assist them in responding appropriately to women who are victim/survivors of sexual assault, provide information on the importance of regular cervical screening, and to ensure all women feel safe and supported when undergoing a Pap test."
As part of the new initiative, CASA is facilitating workshops for nurse Pap test providers in Victoria to help them enhance their clinical practice when working with clients who are victim/survivors of sexual assault. Some of these recommendations include:
- Providing information about the test; what's involved and why it's important.
- Asking about previous experiences of a Pap test.
- Understanding how being a survivor might impact on a woman's response to a Pap test.
- Responding appropriately to disclosures of sexual assault.
- Empowering women to stop the procedure and conducting the test at a pace she is comfortable with.
- Conducting an information session in the first instance and requesting she return at a later date for the test.
According to Hiranthi Perera, community programs manager at PapScreen Victoria, a woman's attitude towards having a Pap test is often reflective of the level of care she has received from her health provider.
"All women, especially those who have experienced something as traumatic as sexual assault, have the right to feel safe and comfortable when undergoing cervical screening," Ms Perera said.
"PapScreen and CASAs will continue to work collaboratively to ensure Pap test providers and CASA counsellors have the training and support they need to encourage women who are victim/survivors of sexual assault to undergo regular Pap tests and reduce their risk of cervical cancer."
In Victoria, 90 per cent of women diagnosed with cervical cancer have not had Pap tests every two years as advised under the national guidelines, highlighting the serious risk associated with underscreening.
(Source: PapScreen Victoria)
More information
![]() | For more information on cancer, including breast, prostate, kidney and stomach cancer, see Cancer: Overview. |
Related Diseases
Related Articles:
- Drinking water prevents cancer? Debunking myths
- New personalised treatment options for cancer
- Possible link between cancer and a common chemical in consumer products
- Cervical cancer rates at all-time low
- IUD reduces by half the risk of cervical cancer
- Fear and poor information increase cervical cancer risks
- Cervical cancer vaccine causing confusion
- Few eligible young women choose to take HPV vaccine to prevent cervical cancer
- Cervical cancer vaccine's added benefit
- Early cervical cancer detection saves lives
Article Comments
Rate this article
List News by Medical Area
Current Sponsors
|
Australia’s leading source for trustworthy medical information written by health professionals. Please be aware that we do not give advice on your individual medical condition, Virtual Medical Centre © 2002 - 2012 | Privacy Policy Last updated 24 May 2012 |
||
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
|
For banner advertising![]() |
Website and videos by![]() Web Design Perth |
| ^ Back to Top | ||














Comment from: Elizabeth (Aust) | 12/11/2011 6:33:56 PM
One way to help these women is to immediately change our harmful and excessive pap testing program, always excessive, but now more than a decade behind the evidence. You can hardly say you understand how difficult this testing is when you're happy to seriously over-screen women which leads straight to sky high rates of over-detection (false positives) and potentially harmful over-treatment. Take a look at other countries who make some effort to contain the harm to the more than 99% of women who can never benefit - this cancer is rare, always was and was in natural decline before testing began...no woman needs a ridiculous 26 or more pap tests. It's harmful... Our lifetime risk of referral - a whopping 77% to cover a cancer with a lifetime risk of 0.65%...and after you take out false negatives, fewer than 0.45 could possibly be helped...there are far better ways of dealing with this rare cancer. Other countries like the Netherlands and Finland offer 5 to 7 pap test programs and have self-test kits and now a self-test HPV kit - the pap test program is 5 yearly from 30 to 50/60 - and the Finns have the lowest rates of cc in the world and send the fewest women for biopsies. (fewer false positives) The Dutch have the same program, but are about to move to 5 hrHPV PRIMARY HPV triage tests offered at age 30, 35, 40, 50 and 60 and only those positive will be offered a 5 yearly pap test (not before age 30 and only up to 7 in total) - those negative and monogamous or no longer sexually active might choose to stop all testing and revisit the subject if their risk profile changes. If negative and active with more than one partner or for women who'd like continued reassurance - they can follow the 5 hrHPV schedule and the self-sample HPV test is already in use in the Netherlands - the Delphi Screener. These options are closed off to Aussie women - we're offered a harmful and excessive program that leads to massive over-treatment. So, to suggest those who control this screening actually care about women is a cruel joke - our program maximizes harm and worry for NO additional benefit - of course, over-screening and over-treatment is highly lucrative for doctors, labs, pathologists, specialists etc It is disgraceful that self-interest keeps this harmful program in place. It's time for Aussie women to walk away from this program and protect themselves from harm - our doctors have deserted us - all silent and collecting target payments for knowingly over-screening their patients and risking their health. If you want to test, demand a reduced schedule and self-test options. (if you prefer) Without some pressure, the groups that benefit from this excessive program will pocket the profits and harm women for as long as they can get away with it. I've always rejected our program - look to the Finns, Dutch, the UK and the Nordic Cochrane Institute for balanced and complete information. In my opinion, Papscreen is a political group there to protect the over-screening program, not women. Women under 30 don't benefit from pap testing, but produce the most false positives - testing does not change the tiny death rate in young women. Our doctors know all of this, but they simply don't care... You'll find the facts at Dr Joel Sherman's medical privacy forum under women's privacy issues - see research by Dr Raffle. Be VERY careful with any "information" or "statistics" provided by screening authorities or those with a vested or political interest. We have a legal right to make informed decisions about ELECTIVE cancer screening, but for some outrageous reason these programs have always provided biased and incomplete information and virtually demanded we test, counting us like sheep to achieve their screening target, using scare campaigns and other unethical tactics, with no regard for our legal rights or individual risk profiles. Men are not treated in this way...time to change an unethical and paternalistic program controlled by and for the benefit of self-interested groups. Don't allow these people to over-screen and harm you! Screening is your decision - get to the facts and make up your own mind...