Men May Not Be Adequately Involved in Decisions About Prostate Cancer Screening
Men largely make decisions about prostate cancer screening based on conversations with their clinicians, but these discussions often do not include information about the risks of testing in addition to the benefits, according to a report in the September 28 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals. A second report in the same issue uses statistical modeling to estimate the benefits and risks of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men of various ages and risk levels.
The majority of American men older than 50 have been screened with the PSA blood test, according to background information in one of the articles. However, the practice is controversial because there is no convincing evidence that screening prevents deaths from the disease, and treating early-stage cancers detected by screenings may lead to important complications. "Given the uncertain benefit for screening and known treatment risks, prostate cancer screening decisions should be guided by patient preferences," the authors write. "Indeed, most professional organizations recommend that the first step in screening should be a discussion between health care providers and patients about the risks and benefits of early detection and treatment so that patients can make informed decisions about whether to be screened."
Richard M. Hoffman, M.D., M.P.H., of New Mexico VA Health Care System and University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, and colleagues conducted a telephone survey of 3,010 randomly selected English-speaking adults age 40 and older in 2006 and 2007. The sample included 375 men who had either undergone or discussed PSA testing with their clinicians in the previous two years. These men were asked what they knew about prostate cancer, what their discussions with clinicians were like and what factors and sources of information influenced their screening decisions.
Overall, 69.9 percent of the men had discussed screening with their clinician before making a decision, including 14.4 percent who chose not to undergo testing. Most often, clinicians raised the idea of screening (64.6 percent), and 73.4 percent recommended it. Recommendation from a clinician was the only characteristic of the discussion associated with testing.
"Although respondents generally endorsed shared decision-making process and felt informed, only 69.9 percent actually discussed screening before making a testing decision, few subjects [32 percent] reported having discussed the cons of screening, 45.2 percent said they were not asked for their preference about PSA testing and performance on knowledge testing was poor," with only 47.8 percent of men correctly answering any of three questions about prostate cancer risk and screening accuracy, the authors write. "Therefore, these discussions-when held-did not meet criteria for shared decision making. Our findings suggest that patients need a greater level of involvement in screening discussions and to be better informed about prostate cancer screening issues."
In a second study, Kirsten Howard, B.Sc., M.App.Sc., M.P.H., M.Health.Econ., Ph.D., of the University of Sydney, Australia, and colleagues constructed a statistical model to provide information for men age 40, 50, 60 and 70 years at low, moderate and high risk for prostate cancer based on family history. Using Australian prostate cancer incidence rates before PSA screening began in 1989 and cancer death rates in 2005, along with data from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer and the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the authors examined two hypothetical cohorts of men who either participated in or declined annual PSA screening.
The model predicts that benefits and harms of annual PSA screening vary with age and risk level. For example, for every 1,000 60-year-old men at low risk, 53 of those who were screened yearly would be diagnosed with prostate cancer and 3.5 would die of the disease during a 10-year period, compared with 23 diagnoses and 4.4 deaths in unscreened men. "For 1,000 men screened from 40 to 69 years of age, there will be 27.9 prostate cancer deaths and 639.5 deaths overall by age 85 years compared with 29.9 prostate cancer deaths and 640.4 deaths overall in unscreened men," the authors write. "Higher-risk men have more prostate cancer deaths averted but also more prostate cancers diagnosed and related harms."
In the model, screened men are two to four times more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than unscreened men, but death rates from prostate cancer and from all causes are not significantly different. This implies that many men whose cancer is detected by PSA screening may be undergoing treatment for clinically insignificant cancers, the authors note.
"In conclusion, before undergoing PSA screening, men should be aware of the possible benefits and harms and of their chances of these benefits and harms occurring," they write. "Even under optimistic assumptions, the net mortality benefit is small, even when prostate cancer deaths are cumulated to 85 years of age. These quantitative estimates can be used to support the goal of individual informed choices about PSA screening."
(Source: Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals: September 2009)
Related Articles:
Article Comments
Rate this article
List News by Medical Area
Current Sponsors
|
Australia’s leading source for trustworthy medical information written by health professionals. Please be aware that we do not give advice on your individual medical condition, Virtual Medical Centre © 2002 - 2012 | Privacy Policy Last updated 24 May 2012 |
||
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
|
For banner advertising![]() |
Website and videos by![]() Web Design Perth |
| ^ Back to Top | ||













Comment from: Risks are Higher Than People Tell You | 10/3/2009 1:27:04 PM
I under went a supposed simple prostate biopsy to test for possible prostate cancer after having an elevated PSA level. I received a warning from specialist and my GP saying there was a remote risk of infection associated with the test that may require hospitalisation. Both parties gave little specific advice on the possible severity of the infection that could occur. I expressed concerned and decided at first not to proceed but my GP suggested I was over reacting and the chances of anything happening were so remote it was not worthy of my concern. Of course one day after the biopsy I became infected and ended up with acute infection requiring four days hospitalisation. At one stage my temperature reached 43C and I was close to requiring intensive care treatment. I required oxygen, ice baths, a catheter in my penis and four days of intravenous antibiotics. Fortunately at end of it all I had no indication of prostate cancer. However the risks associated with treatment are higher than people let on and potentially far more severe.
Comment from: David Rafferty | 10/3/2009 4:49:39 PM
Re: 'Risks are higher than people tell you' My GP has never mentioned such testing to me - although I had heard of it, during online searching of medical sites. I never realised that such tests could cause results such as above! I am 75 years old and had a PSA of 9.1 (28/12/07) and now 9.7 (23/01/09). I have to request a PSA blood test each year - unlike some women, who are notified by a Govt Dept, that their Breast and Pap smear tests are due. How come? Finally, how relevant is a 'high' PSA reading to having cancer, and what really constitutes a 'high' reading? Regards, David
Comment from: David | 10/4/2009 10:36:38 AM
My PSA test last year was 3.6 and I underwent a physical test by my GP who felt several nodules. I was sent to a specialist who more thaqt adequately explained all risks to me. I had the biopsy (positive) and had a radical op in April this year. I have an extremely minimal problem with my waterflow which is improving all the time. I have had no infections or any other problems. I am 59 years old and discussed all possibilities including impotence with my wife before hand. We are grey nomads and agreed that the idea of living without the shadow of cancer and ongoing treatments was better than the terminal option. Having read the above my experience is not uncommon as I have spoken with may others who have had the same experience. I think there is risk in most procedures and it is a matter of following all instructions to the letter and not listening to some who tend to be scaremongers or trying to change the world.
Comment from: Tom | 10/4/2009 11:28:32 AM
I have discussed testing with my GP and have had rectal and PSA tests done since I turned 50 (now 62). I would rather have the tests and be made aware of problems before they get out of hand.
Comment from: Anton | 10/7/2009 11:25:00 PM
Have had Prostate Cancer 10 years this month, 12 years ago I went to a GP asking for a PSA test. Talked out of it. When diognised PSA 47. If I had been tested that two years prior thimgs may have been different,now Gleeson Facter ten. All men should be tested. All the seems to me is a Government wanting to save money