It's not OK to smack children
A Charles Sturt University (CSU) lecturer in child youth and family welfare strongly endorses a recent call by leading paediatricians to outlaw physical chastisement of children.
Mr Neil Barber, a lecturer at the CSU School of Humanities and Social Sciences in Wagga Wagga, supports the recently publicised call by Dr Gervase Chaney and Professor Frank Oberklaid of the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne. Dr Chaney said that the claim of many of adults, that 'smacking never did us any harm as a child', is extremely problematic.
Mr Barber agrees with Dr Chaney because, "The evidence from Australia and around the world over many decades is pretty clear; most parents who smack a child do so as a reaction to their own emotional stressors, rather than to help the child understand their behaviour or vulnerability.
"While an individual instance of smacking might not be injurious, smacking is intended to cause pain, and research with children in Australia and elsewhere has shown that children get lots of messages from being smacked but not about changing behaviour," Mr Barber said.
"Children have reported that they are aware of how their parent or carer is feeling when they smack them, and that often they believe those feelings are negative about them (the child) as a person, not about their behaviour as such. When parents or carers act out of their own considerable and compounded stress, then the awareness of the child's age, understanding, and vulnerability is not in mind, and hitting can escalate in frequency, intensity and recklessness. For a child in such situations there are very real threats to physical and emotional safety, but also over time they themselves may begin to react to their emotional stressors by hitting out."
Mr Barber acknowledged that many parents believe they can distinguish between smacking as a cautionary act and as a punishment.
"A common rationale given is that if a two-year-old is playing with an electricity power point a smack on the hand will stop them momentarily," Mr Barber said. "It will cause pain and distress, and confusion, but it won't communicate the reality of danger, even if the word, 'danger' is given at the same time. The word becomes associated with the power point, not the danger of electrocution.
"With older children, consistency and fairness are important. Children are acutely aware when they are being accused or dealt with unreasonably or unfairly, and the only reason they are likely to comply as a result of being hit in such situations is out of fear."
Mr Barber said, education is helpful, but more critical is enabling parents to feel confident to do things differently, and that requires society to realise parents may have children who at times behave 'like children' and that helping children to learn requires patience, constancy, and time.
Mr Barber also agrees with Professor Oberklaid's call for smacking of children to be outlawed.
"I argue that the continued provision of a legal defence for injuring a child - on the grounds that it was intended to administer corrective discipline - is outmoded and unreasonably excuses parents and carers from being required to think before they behave in ways intended to cause pain to a child.
"Even in NSW, which has at least legislated that it is not defensible to hit a child on the head or body or with an implement, it continues to create this ambivalence that hitting children is OK, and even beneficial," Mr Barber said.
"I have reservations about establishing criminal codes against smacking children, because - and this is a critical point - an assault is an assault whatever the age of the victim and any differentiation about age is likely to preserve the ambivalence in society about whether there is a distinction to be made about behaviour toward children."
(Source: Charles Sturt University)
More information
![]() | For more information on parenting, including child development milestones, work-life balance and tips for spending more time with family, see Parenting. |
Related Articles:
- How chronic stress short-circuits parenting
- Authoritative parenting style influences family eating behaviour and better nutrition in adolescents
- Good parenting triumphs over prenatal stress
- Positive parenting helps encourage healthy sun habits in children
Article Comments
Rate this article
List News by Medical Area
Current Sponsors
|
Australia’s leading source for trustworthy medical information written by health professionals. Please be aware that we do not give advice on your individual medical condition, Virtual Medical Centre © 2002 - 2012 | Privacy Policy Last updated 24 May 2012 |
||
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
|
For banner advertising![]() |
Website and videos by![]() Web Design Perth |
| ^ Back to Top | ||














Comment from: Dan | 2/21/2012 3:37:59 PM
I'm all for changing 'for the good', however no alternative to smacking was offered in this article. Many children, especially the young, are slow to learn through verbal education when it comes to 'staying away from things that could hurt you'. In the case of an electrical outlet, how are you supposed to demonstrate the misuse of power to a toddler? A smack, at the very least, teaches them that it isn't a good idea to mess with it, even if it is only to avoid being hurt by another smack. I have found verbal discipline to be a very poor teacher, especially when my brain grows tired, or bored, and switches off. On the other hand, experience is the best teacher out there. Perhaps we should simply sit and watch our children put their finger in the power socket and have them learn the hard way? Sometimes I think the politically correct just want to outlaw everything bad, or that causes offence, in the hope that there is a better way, when, in truth, life is punishing to everyone, and leads to inevitable death. Reality check, anyone?
Comment from: Chris Jones | 2/21/2012 4:20:13 PM
it's not OK to smack children What a lot of rubbish! I have smacked my child once only from then on both of my children respected that when I said no that was the answer. Some children do need more that a harsh word,"Stop that for the fifth time", just is not the way to bring up a child, a child needs to understand that there are consequences for all of their action, from screaming to lying and all the other unsociable misbehaver. I am sorry for those who think that a young child will not test the adult to the limit, that is the way of the animal, we have all heard the saying "pecking order" all children will try to see if they can be the top child/person.
Comment from: Harry Blair | 2/22/2012 10:18:26 AM
With attitudes like those of Dr. Chaney and Prof. Oberklaid it is little wonder we have no discipline in schools, on the streets and with mamby pamby parents who let thier children run wild in shops etc. A quick smack on the bum is not child abuse. Belting with a wooden spoon and a belt is. These academics do not seem to know the difference.